We Played "Guess the Pharma Ad" and Failed Miserably
Self-Funded
@SelfFunded
Published: October 31, 2025
Insights
This video features a game titled "Guess the Pharma Ad," where hosts attempt to identify direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmaceutical drugs based solely on their visual commercials, with all drug information obscured. The primary purpose of the segment is to highlight the often-confusing, abstract, and seemingly disconnected nature of pharmaceutical advertising, particularly the reliance on generic "B-roll" footage rather than direct depictions of conditions or drug effects. The hosts, Nathaniel Smith and Kyle Minick, react with amusement and frustration as they try to match vague visuals to specific medications, ultimately demonstrating how difficult it is for even informed viewers to discern the purpose of these high-budget advertisements.
Throughout the game, the discussion naturally pivots to the staggering costs associated with these advertised drugs. As each commercial's true identity is revealed, the annual out-of-pocket costs for medications like Eylea, Ponvori, Nerdt ODT, Renvoke, and Skyrizi are disclosed, ranging from tens of thousands to over a hundred thousand dollars annually. This financial revelation underscores the significant economic implications of these drugs for patients and healthcare systems. The hosts also touch upon the specific indications for each drug, noting how broad some of them are (e.g., Skyrizi for multiple inflammatory conditions) and the often tenuous link between the ad's narrative and the drug's therapeutic target.
The video progresses through five distinct commercials, each prompting guesses and commentary on the ad's production value, narrative, and perceived target demographic. From a ballet performance to anime sequences and celebrity endorsements, the diverse advertising styles are critiqued for their lack of clarity and direct relevance to the conditions they treat. The segment concludes with a reveal of how poorly the participants performed in the guessing game, reinforcing the central thesis that DTC pharma ads are inherently confusing and often fail to clearly communicate their message, despite their high production costs and the critical nature of the products they promote.
Key Takeaways:
- Prevalence of DTC Pharma Advertising: Direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical commercials are ubiquitous, particularly in media targeting older demographics (e.g., NASCAR broadcasts), indicating a significant investment by pharmaceutical companies in this marketing channel.
- Abstract and Confusing Ad Content: Many DTC pharma ads rely heavily on generic "B-roll" footage (e.g., happy families, nature scenes) that bears little to no direct relation to the drug's indication or mechanism of action, making it difficult for viewers to understand what the product is for.
- High Production Values: Despite their often vague messaging, these commercials frequently boast high production values, including elaborate animation (e.g., a French anime commercial for Ponvori) and celebrity endorsements (e.g., Lady Gaga for Nerdt ODT), suggesting substantial marketing budgets.
- Staggering Drug Costs: The annual out-of-pocket costs for many specialty drugs advertised are exceptionally high, with examples including Eylea ($10,000), Nerdt ODT ($13,000-$20,000), Renvoke ($17,000-$30,000), Ponvori ($84,000-$100,000), and Skyrizi ($120,000-$240,000).
- Broad Indications for Specialty Drugs: Several high-cost drugs, such as Renvoke and Skyrizi, are approved to treat multiple conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis), positioning them as multi-purpose solutions for inflammatory and autoimmune disorders.
- Challenges in Patient Education: The abstract nature of these commercials presents a significant challenge for patient education, as the ads often fail to clearly communicate the drug's purpose, benefits, or the specific condition it treats, potentially leading to confusion or misinformed inquiries.
- Impact of Rebates on Drug Pricing: The discussion briefly highlights how rebates, often negotiated through Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), can significantly reduce the net cost of a drug, impacting the actual out-of-pocket expense for patients versus the list price.
- Demographic Targeting: Ads are often tailored to perceived demographic interests, such as basketball for an arthritis medication, although the connection to the actual drug's benefit can still be tenuous.
- Regulatory Compliance Implications (Implicit): While not explicitly discussed, the confusing nature of these ads implicitly raises questions about how pharmaceutical companies balance creative marketing with regulatory requirements for clear and non-misleading communication about drug efficacy and safety.
- Opportunity for AI in Marketing Analysis: The observed disconnect between ad content and drug purpose suggests an opportunity for AI and LLM solutions to analyze the effectiveness of pharmaceutical commercial operations, potentially identifying patterns in successful patient engagement or optimizing content for clarity and compliance.
Key Concepts:
- Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Pharma Advertising: Pharmaceutical companies marketing prescription drugs directly to the public through mass media.
- B-roll: Supplemental or alternate footage intercut with the main shot, often generic or illustrative, used to establish a mood or provide visual context without direct narrative.
- Specialty Drugs: High-cost, high-complexity medications often used to treat chronic, rare, or complex conditions, typically requiring special handling, administration, or monitoring.
- Indications: The specific conditions or diseases for which a drug is approved and prescribed.
- Annual Cost (Out-of-Pocket): The estimated yearly expense a patient might incur for a medication, often before insurance or rebates.
Examples/Case Studies:
- Eylea: An eye disease medication (e.g., age-related macular degeneration) with an annual cost of approximately $10,000. Its commercial featured a grandmother watching ballet.
- Ponvori: A multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment, costing $84,000-$100,000 annually. Its ad was a high-production-value French anime sequence.
- Nerdt ODT: A drug for treating and preventing migraines, with an annual cost of $13,000-$20,000. Featured Lady Gaga in its commercial.
- Renvoke: Treats rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, costing $17,000-$30,000 annually. Its commercial showed men playing basketball.
- Skyrizi: Treats rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, with an annual cost of $120,000-$240,000 (before rebates). Its ad featured a music teacher.