Doctors Split from Hospital System... How'd They Do It??
AHealthcareZ - Healthcare Finance Explained
@ahealthcarez
Published: September 10, 2022
Insights
This video provides an in-depth exploration of how a large group of physicians successfully broke away from a major hospital system to establish an independent practice, focusing on patient-centered, cost-effective care. Dr. Eric Bricker narrates the compelling story of Tryon Medical Partners in Charlotte, North Carolina, detailing their grievances against Atrium Health and the subsequent steps they took to regain autonomy. The presentation highlights the operational and financial pressures exerted by traditional fee-for-service hospital models on physicians and the innovative alternative models that independent practices can adopt.
The narrative begins by outlining the core reasons for the physicians' discontent: Atrium Health's cost-cutting measures, such as replacing nurses with less expensive medical assistants, and increasing patient quotas while decreasing visit times to just 8 minutes of face-to-face interaction. These changes, driven by a fee-for-service billing model, were perceived by the doctors as detrimental to patient care, particularly in complex primary care scenarios requiring detailed histories and coordinated management. Furthermore, the hospital system expanded non-compete agreements, restricting physician mobility. Facing these challenges, 88 doctors from Tryon Medical Partners, a multi-specialty group primarily focused on primary care, took the courageous step of suing Atrium Health to secure their independence.
Upon reaching an agreement to separate, Tryon Medical Partners faced the significant challenge of establishing eight new clinics in less than six months, a venture entirely financed by the doctors themselves. This transition underscored the risks and entrepreneurial spirit required for independence. Crucially, over 80% of their 110,000 patients chose to follow the doctors, demonstrating strong patient loyalty to individual practitioners rather than the hospital system. Post-separation, Tryon Medical Partners leveraged their independence to implement innovative care models. Within a year, they launched a Direct Primary Care (DPC) service for local employers, offering subscription-based, no-billing, unlimited visits, and have since signed up 30 companies. They also engage in at-risk contracts with Medicare Advantage plans, moving away from the restrictive fee-for-service model towards value-based care. Dr. Bricker emphasizes that this freedom allows doctors to spend more time with patients, provide better coordinated care, and ultimately lower healthcare costs by preventing hospitalizations, ER visits, and unnecessary specialist referrals, aligning with the principles of a "third-generation patient-centered medical home."
Key Takeaways:
- Physician Autonomy and Burnout: Hospital systems often impose operational changes (e.g., replacing nurses with MAs, reducing visit times) driven by financial incentives, leading to physician dissatisfaction and burnout due to perceived compromises in patient care.
- Impact of Fee-for-Service: The traditional fee-for-service model incentivizes hospitals to maximize patient volume and procedures, often at the expense of quality time with patients, leading to increased testing, referrals, and overall healthcare costs.
- Direct Primary Care (DPC) as an Alternative: Independent practices can successfully adopt DPC models, offering subscription-based services directly to employers or individuals, eliminating insurance billing complexities, and allowing for unlimited, longer patient visits.
- Value-Based Care Models: Moving beyond fee-for-service, independent groups can engage in at-risk contracts (e.g., with Medicare Advantage plans), aligning financial incentives with patient outcomes and cost reduction.
- Patient Loyalty to Physicians: The case of Tryon Medical Partners demonstrates that patient loyalty often lies with their individual doctors rather than the hospital system, with over 80% of patients following their physicians to the new independent practice.
- Challenges and Risks of Independence: Establishing an independent practice requires significant financial investment (doctor-financed in this case) and rapid operational setup (e.g., opening eight clinics in six months), highlighting the entrepreneurial courage required.
- Operational Efficiency in Independent Practices: Independent groups can streamline operations, such as having doctors directly answer patient calls, fostering a more direct and patient-centric service model compared to large call centers.
- Importance of Time in Primary Care: Effective primary care, especially for complex patients, hinges on sufficient time for detailed histories, communication, and care coordination, which is often curtailed in fee-for-service models.
- Courage as a Catalyst for Change: The video emphasizes that "courage" is the foundational virtue enabling physicians to challenge existing systems, exit unfavorable employment situations, and innovate for better patient and professional outcomes.
- Cost-Effective, High-Quality Care: Independent practices, freed from fee-for-service pressures, are better positioned to focus on preventive care, coordinated management, and reducing unnecessary interventions, leading to lower overall healthcare costs and improved patient outcomes.
- Third-Generation Patient-Centered Medical Home: The DPC model exemplified by Tryon Medical Partners aligns with the principles of a patient-centered medical home, focusing on comprehensive, coordinated, accessible care with a strong emphasis on patient relationships.
- Implications for the Broader Healthcare Ecosystem: The success of independent physician groups and alternative payment models like DPC signals a significant shift in healthcare delivery that impacts pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and other life sciences entities by changing the landscape of patient access, prescribing patterns, and data collection.
Key Concepts:
- Direct Primary Care (DPC): A healthcare model where patients pay a monthly or annual fee directly to their primary care provider for a defined set of services, typically including unlimited visits, direct access to the doctor, and no billing to insurance.
- Fee-for-Service: A traditional payment model where healthcare providers are paid for each service they provide (e.g., office visit, test, procedure), incentivizing volume over value.
- At-Risk Medicare Advantage Plans: Healthcare providers or organizations take on financial risk for the total cost of care for a group of Medicare Advantage patients, incentivizing them to manage care efficiently and improve outcomes to stay within budget.
- Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH): A model of care that aims to improve primary healthcare by transforming how primary care is organized and delivered, emphasizing comprehensive, coordinated, accessible, and patient-centered care.
Examples/Case Studies:
- Tryon Medical Partners vs. Atrium Health: The central case study of 88 primary care and multi-specialty doctors successfully suing and separating from Atrium Health in Charlotte, North Carolina, to form an independent practice focused on Direct Primary Care and value-based models.